The language curmudgeon . . .

Who the Bell Tolls For

by Conrad Weisert
April 25, 2013

©2013, Information Disciplines, Inc.
This article may be circulated freely, as long as the copyright credit is included.

I just learned from the Atlantic magazine1 that I may be considered a "pompous twerp". My offense, says "Wordplay" columnist Megan Garber, is to continue using the objective case of the pronoun who!

Of course, I immediately did a Google search of this web-site and turned up an embarrassing 24 instances of the pompous obsolete pronoun whom.2 Ms. Garber quotes a language blogger who she respects:

"Whom is unnecessary—indeed, it's out of place—where a conversational tone is sought."

So, now I've been warned. I'll try to keep that in mind.

*   *   *   *

Ms. Garber also cites avoiding splitting infinitives and ending sentences with prepositions as similar obsolete niceties of English. Actually most Americans understand that final prepositions are a long-accepted English idiom (but perhaps not the sort of Americans around with whom I generally hang).

1—April, 2013, p. 18
2—Of course you can find them, too. Presumably, Google will now report 25 instances. I'll welcome any sensible suggestions for appropriately modernizing the language.

Return to Business and culture articles
IDI home page.

Last modified April 25, 2013